# "Smart maintenance based on vehicle CAN bus data from scratch in Python"¶

"In this article we prototype an algorithm that automatically scores engine health based on vehicle CAN bus data."

• toc: true
• branch: master
• categories: [python, numpy, data-driven products, smart maintenance, scikit-learn]

# Summary¶

Equipment that behaves anomalously or breaks down unexpectedly is a major cost driver in manufacturing, logistics, public transport, and any other sector that relies on complex machinery.

A big promise of data analytics and machine learning in this space is to detect anomalies in machinery automatically and to alert their user of occurring faults. As an extension, the prediction of machinery faults and breakdowns is an important field of application.

Automated detection and prediction of machinery breakdown is a key algorithmic approach behind smart and predictive maintenance.

In this article we showcase a simple algorithmic approach for anomaly detection in the space of automated engine health detection.

Our approach here can be an interesting starting point for the development of smart telematics solutions for automated and predictive vehicle breakdown detection.

# Fetch the data¶

We'll make use of an open data set of vehicle CAN bus data, called Automotive CAN bus data: An Example Dataset from the AEGIS Big Data Project.

A CAN bus is a local network of sensors and actuators in modern vehicles that provides a stream of data for all important signals of a vehicle - such as its present velocity, interior temperature, and potentially hundreds of other signals.

This data set encompasses time series data (traces) of various vehicles driven by different drivers.

Let's go ahead and download a data set for driver 1 and a data set for driver 2:

In [0]:
!wget --quiet https://zenodo.org/record/3267184/files/20181113_Driver1_Trip1.hdf

In [0]:
!wget --quiet https://zenodo.org/record/3267184/files/20181114_Driver2_Trip3.hdf


Here we import all necessary Python libraries for our analysis and algorithm:

In [0]:
import h5py
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns

from sklearn.mixture import GaussianMixture

In [0]:
plt.rcParams['figure.figsize'] = (10,10)
sns.set(style="darkgrid")


Let's load the data for driver 1 and driver 2 into memory:

In [0]:
driver_1 = h5py.File('20181113_Driver1_Trip1.hdf', 'r')
driver_2 = h5py.File('20181114_Driver2_Trip3.hdf', 'r')


Both files contain multiple subgroups of data, one of which is the aformentioned CAN bus:

In [6]:
list(driver_1.keys())

Out[6]:
['AI', 'CAN', 'GPS', 'Math', 'Plugins']
In [7]:
list(driver_2.keys())

Out[7]:
['AI', 'CAN', 'GPS', 'Math', 'Plugins']

# Turn time series data into tables¶

The CAN bus data comes in serialized form - written out in series in a nested format.

To handle the CAN bus data more efficiently we'll turn it into tables that are easier to inspect and handle.

In [0]:
data_driver_1 = {}
data_driver_2 = {}

for channel_name, channel_data in driver_1['CAN'].items():
data_driver_1[channel_name] = channel_data[:, 0]

table_driver_1 = pd.DataFrame(
data=data_driver_1,
index=channel_data[:, 1]
)
table_driver_1 = table_driver_1.loc[:, table_driver_1.nunique() > 1]

for channel_name, channel_data in driver_2['CAN'].items():
data_driver_2[channel_name] = channel_data[:, 0]

table_driver_2 = pd.DataFrame(
data=data_driver_2,
index=channel_data[:, 1]
)
table_driver_2 = table_driver_2.loc[:, table_driver_2.nunique() > 1]


The tabular data for driver 1 looks as follows - it holds 158,659 measured time points in 28 channels that we deem relevant:

In [9]:
table_driver_1

Out[9]:
AccPedal AirIntakeTemperature AmbientTemperature BoostPressure BrkVoltage ENG_Trq_DMD ENG_Trq_ZWR ENG_Trq_m_ex EngineSpeed_CAN EngineTemperature Engine_02_BZ Engine_02_CHK OilTemperature1 SCS_01_BZ SCS_01_CHK SCS_Cancel SCS_Tip_Down SCS_Tip_Set SCS_Tip_Up SteerAngle1 Trq_FrictionLoss Trq_Indicated VehicleSpeed WheelSpeed_FL WheelSpeed_FR WheelSpeed_RL WheelSpeed_RR Yawrate1
0.000000 0.0 31.5 8.0 0.97 1.0 18.0 20.0 27.000000 809.500000 93.0 6.000000 168.000000 82.0 9.000000 27.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 125.599998 29.0 27.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.190000
0.050000 0.0 31.5 8.0 0.97 1.0 18.0 20.0 27.000000 809.500000 93.0 6.000000 168.000000 82.0 9.000000 27.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 125.599998 29.0 27.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.190000
0.100000 0.0 31.5 8.0 0.97 1.0 18.0 20.0 27.000000 810.215759 93.0 10.331579 163.663162 82.0 9.333000 26.000999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 125.599998 29.0 27.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.209900
0.150000 0.0 31.5 8.0 0.97 1.0 18.0 20.0 27.384237 807.657654 93.0 9.605911 165.674881 82.0 9.833000 24.500999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 125.599998 29.0 27.384237 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.204887
0.200000 0.0 31.5 8.0 0.97 1.0 18.0 20.0 27.000000 805.500000 93.0 4.358586 172.641418 82.0 10.333000 24.333000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 125.599998 28.0 27.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.200000
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
7932.700195 0.0 25.5 9.5 0.98 0.0 20.0 19.0 29.000000 797.500000 96.0 8.174129 84.825874 96.0 10.493239 24.493240 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.100000 29.0 29.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.130000
7932.750000 0.0 25.5 9.5 0.98 0.0 19.0 19.0 29.000000 800.500000 96.0 13.164251 145.835754 96.0 10.993991 24.993992 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.100000 29.0 29.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.123609
7932.799805 0.0 25.5 9.5 0.98 0.0 19.0 19.0 29.000000 797.790588 96.0 2.177665 156.822342 96.0 11.494000 27.469999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.100000 28.0 29.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.178596
7932.850098 0.0 25.5 9.5 0.98 0.0 19.0 19.0 29.000000 796.000000 96.0 7.180095 153.739334 96.0 11.994000 29.969999 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.100000 28.0 29.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.157268
7932.899902 0.0 25.5 9.5 0.98 0.0 19.0 19.0 29.000000 794.500000 96.0 12.155440 146.844559 96.0 12.494247 30.494247 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.100000 28.0 29.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.140000

158659 rows × 28 columns

The tabular data for driver 2 looks as follows - it holds 136,154 measured time points in 29 channels that we deem relevant:

In [10]:
table_driver_2

Out[10]:
AccPedal AirIntakeTemperature AmbientTemperature BoostPressure BrkVoltage ENG_Trq_DMD ENG_Trq_ZWR ENG_Trq_m_ex EngineSpeed_CAN EngineTemperature Engine_02_BZ Engine_02_CHK OilTemperature1 SCS_01_BZ SCS_01_CHK SCS_Cancel SCS_Tip_Down SCS_Tip_Restart SCS_Tip_Set SCS_Tip_Up SteerAngle1 Trq_FrictionLoss Trq_Indicated VehicleSpeed WheelSpeed_FL WheelSpeed_FR WheelSpeed_RL WheelSpeed_RR Yawrate1
0.000000 0.0 44.25 14.5 1.00 1.0 20.000000 21.0 30.000000 791.000000 96.0 6.000000 59.000000 94.0 10.000000 24.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.800000 31.0 30.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.140000
0.050000 0.0 44.25 14.5 1.00 1.0 21.000000 20.0 30.000000 791.000000 96.0 10.688680 102.688683 94.0 10.000000 24.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.800000 31.0 30.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.120000
0.100000 0.0 44.25 14.5 1.00 1.0 21.000000 20.0 30.000000 791.165039 96.0 4.381188 105.079208 94.0 10.110166 24.110165 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.800000 31.0 30.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.148120
0.150000 0.0 44.25 14.5 1.00 1.0 21.000000 20.0 30.751268 787.500000 96.0 4.725888 104.725891 94.0 10.610916 24.610916 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.800000 31.0 30.751268 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.126384
0.200000 0.0 44.25 14.5 1.00 1.0 21.000000 20.0 31.000000 791.000000 96.0 9.733668 101.733665 94.0 11.111500 25.557501 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.800000 31.0 31.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.135592
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
6807.450195 0.0 25.50 10.5 0.98 1.0 21.000000 21.0 31.000000 815.500000 94.5 10.693069 118.693069 95.0 5.992500 22.394501 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.400002 30.0 31.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.130326
6807.500000 0.0 25.50 10.5 0.98 1.0 21.000000 21.0 30.682692 813.500000 94.5 5.192307 120.884613 95.0 0.100500 18.100500 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.400002 30.0 30.682692 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.150000
6807.549805 0.0 25.50 10.5 0.98 1.0 21.000000 21.0 31.000000 816.000000 94.5 4.676768 120.676765 95.0 0.600500 18.600500 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.476120 30.0 31.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.140351
6807.600098 0.0 25.50 10.5 0.98 1.0 20.323383 21.0 30.000000 819.587524 94.5 9.676617 74.726372 95.0 1.100550 18.698349 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.476616 30.0 30.000000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.140000
6807.649902 0.0 25.50 10.5 0.98 1.0 22.000000 21.0 30.722773 810.048096 94.5 14.693069 178.693069 95.0 1.600800 17.197599 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.500000 31.0 30.722773 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.129625

136154 rows × 29 columns

# Monitoring engine health¶

One use case of automated anomaly detection lies in checking the health status of a vehicle's engine.

Here we'll look at engine oil temperature as a function of velocity: As you'll notice in the below plots, oil temperature goes up with higher velocity and increased operating duration.

## Engine 1 - healthy¶

Let's look at the engine of the vehicle of driver 1 where engine oil temperature appears normal as it keeps to within a certain band:

In [26]:
temperature_1 = table_driver_1[['VehicleSpeed', 'OilTemperature1']].copy()

sns.relplot(
x='index',
y='value',
hue='channel',
kind='line',
data=temperature_1.reset_index().melt(id_vars='index', var_name='channel')
);


Plotting engine oil temperature against vehicle velocity makes the correlation between the two metrics more apparent:

In [43]:
plot = sns.scatterplot(
x='VehicleSpeed',
y='OilTemperature1',
data=temperature_1,
color='blue',
alpha=.1
);
plot.axes.set_ylim(0., 110.);


## Engine 2 - unhealthy¶

Let's look at velocity and engine oil temperature for vehicle 2 (where I deliberately introduce an anomaly between 5000 and 5500 seconds of the trace).

You'll notice a spike in engine oil temperature which indicates unhealthy behavior of the vehicle's engine:

In [27]:
temperature_2 = table_driver_2[['VehicleSpeed', 'OilTemperature1']].copy()
temperature_2.loc[5000:5500, 'OilTemperature1'] *= 1.15

sns.relplot(
x='index',
y='value',
hue='channel',
kind='line',
data=temperature_2.reset_index().melt(id_vars='index', var_name='channel')
);

In [42]:
plot = sns.scatterplot(
x='VehicleSpeed',
y='OilTemperature1',
data=temperature_2,
color='blue',
alpha=.1
);
plot.axes.set_ylim(0., 140.);


# Anomaly detection algorithm: learn what observations to expect to recognize anomalies¶

Let's look at the visual distribution of engine oil temperature and velocity again and directly compare vehicle 1 with vehicle 2.

In [46]:
temperature_1['vehicle'] = 'vehicle 1'
temperature_2['vehicle'] = 'vehicle 2'
combined = pd.concat([temperature_1, temperature_2], axis=0, sort=True)

plot = sns.scatterplot(
x='VehicleSpeed',
y='OilTemperature1',
data=combined,
hue='vehicle',
alpha=.1
);
plot.axes.set_ylim(0., 140.);


You'll notice that the engine oil temperature of vehicle 2 tends to be higher than of vehicle 1 and vehicle 2 shows an island of high engine oil temperature separated from the bulk of data points.

We can use this by modelling the distribution of value pairs velocity and oil temperature that we would usually expect to observe.

Let's model the expected distribution of data points with a model called Gaussian mixture models. This model fits a set of Gaussian distributions to the distribution of value pairs we observed for vehicle 1 - thus defining what a healthy distribution of values looks like.

In [0]:
model = GaussianMixture(n_components=4)

In [17]:
model.fit(temperature_1[['VehicleSpeed', 'OilTemperature1']])

Out[17]:
GaussianMixture(covariance_type='full', init_params='kmeans', max_iter=100,
means_init=None, n_components=4, n_init=1, precisions_init=None,
random_state=None, reg_covar=1e-06, tol=0.001, verbose=0,
verbose_interval=10, warm_start=False, weights_init=None)

After training our model on the observations for vehicle 1, let's score the likelihood of observing each observation we have on vehicle 2:

In [0]:
temperature_2['health_score'] = model.score_samples(temperature_2[['VehicleSpeed', 'OilTemperature1']])

In [31]:
sns.relplot(
x='index',
y='value',
hue='metric',
kind='line',
data=temperature_2[['OilTemperature1', 'health_score']].reset_index().melt(id_vars='index', var_name='metric')
);


To clarify what we did here: We learned what a healthy distribution of vehicle velocity and engine oil temperature looks like based on data from vehicle 1 and applied this model to data from vehicle 2.

Looking at the health score we compute for vehicle 2 we notice that our health score drops markdely between 5000 and 5500 seconds into our CAN bus trace - exactly where oil temperature spikes unhealthily.

While we would need to do a lot more validation and model calibration before we could use this approach in a live environment, we can already see the potential of this approach.

With this approach we can start devising data-driven products and services for smart telematics and smart maintenance applications.