#!/usr/bin/env python
# coding: utf-8
#
cs1001.py , Tel Aviv University, Spring 2019
#
# # Recitation 3
# We talked about binary numbers (with some theory) and base conversions and implemented an algorithm for base conversion (from decimal to 2<=b<=36).
# We examined Python's memory model and analyzed the efficiency of constructing a list using + or += operators.
#
#
#
# ### Takeaways:
# 1. Make sure you understand binary numbers and base conversions (including the algorithms for conversion to and from a base b to decimal). It is a very useful tool in computer science.
# 2. Elements of a list can be changed from inside a function, if this list is given as a parameter. Note that one should use dedicated list functions or the [] operator for mutating the list.
# 3. Use [Python tutor](http://www.pythontutor.com) in order to understand what's going on in terms of memory. It can be very helpful.
# 4. Try to analyze the number of operations your function does to see how will its runtime scale as a function of the input (we will elabore on this soon).
#
# ### Python tutor guidelines:
# Before you click "Visualize Execution" button, you may want to use the following settings (can be adjusted via the drop boxes next to the textbox):
#
# - Python 3.6
# -
# Show exited frames (Python)
# - Render all objects on the heap
# - Draw pointers as arrows [default]
#
#
#
# ## The binary system and base conversions
# We use decimal numbers, that is, numbers in base 10. These numbers are represented using 10 digits (0-9).
# Binary numbers (in base 2) use two possible digits: 0-1.
# In general, a number in base $b$ will be represented using $b$ possible digits.
#
#
# #### Code for printing several outputs in one cell (not part of the recitation):
# In[2]:
from IPython.core.interactiveshell import InteractiveShell
InteractiveShell.ast_node_interactivity = "all"
# ## Base conversions
# Using Python functions:
# In[3]:
bin(10)
type(bin(10))
hex(161)
int("345")
int("1101", 2)
int("a1", 16)
int("a1", 2)
# ### Converting from binary to decimal
#
# Let $x_{base 2} = a_{n-1} ... a_1 a_0$ be a binary number in base 2 with $n$ digits.
# The following formula returns its decimal representation:
# $$x_{base 10} = \sum_{0 \le k \le n-1} a_k \cdot 2^k$$
# ### Converting from decimal to binary
# Converting from decimal to binary is done by integer division and modulo operations.
# Here is an implementation of the algorithm for conversion from decimal to a general base $b$.
# #### Our version for convert_base:
# In[6]:
def convert_base(n,b):
'''convert_base(int, int)->string
Returns the textual representation
of n(decimal) in base 2<=b<=10
'''
result = ""
while n != 0:
digit = n % b
n //= b
result = str(digit) + result
return result
# In[7]:
convert_base(10,2)
# In[8]:
convert_base(0, 2)
# convert_base above mishandles n = 0
# #### Improved version of convert_base:
# In[26]:
def convert_base(n,b):
'''convert_base(int, int)->string
Returns the textual representation
of n(decimal) in base 2<=b<=10
'''
if n == 0:
return "0"
result = ""
while n != 0:
digit = n % b
n //= b
result = str(digit) + result
return result
# In[10]:
convert_base(0,2)
convert_base(12,3)
# In[11]:
convert_base(161,16)
# The improved version above fails for 10string
Returns the textual representation
of n(decimal) in base 2<=b<=10
'''
assert 2 <= b <= 36
if n == 0:
return "0"
result = ""
alphabet = "0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
while n != 0:
digit = n % b
n //= b
result = alphabet[digit] + result
return result
# In[13]:
convert_base(161, 16)
convert_base(10, 2)
convert_base(10, 80)
# ## Memory model
# By understanding Python's memory model we
#
# - can distinguish between objects that can be mutated and those that cannot. We can also understand how to mutate objects.
# - can write a more efficient code.
#
#
#
#
# #### Motivation examples:
# In[14]:
def change_num(num):
num = 999
x = 30
change_num(x)
x
# In[15]:
def add_to_list(lst):
lst.append(999)
mylst = [1,2,3]
add_to_list(mylst)
mylst
# In[16]:
def change_lst(lst):
lst = []
mylst = [1,2,3]
change_lst(mylst)
mylst
# #### Programs examined with [Python tutor](http:\\www.pythontutor.com):
# In[ ]:
#1 basics #####################################################
a = 1000 #1
b = "hello" #2
a += len(b) #3
c = 2*b[:2] #4
if b!=c: #5
c = b #6
del c #7
# In[ ]:
#2 lists #####################################################
a = 1000 #1
d = [a,2] #2
d[1] = -1 #3
a = 1003 #4
for x in d: #5a
x = 7 #5b
# In[ ]:
#3 funcs #####################################################
a = 1000 #1
b = "hello" #2
def is_palindrom(a): #3a
b = a[::-1] #3b
return a==b #3c
is_pal = is_palindrom #4
x = is_pal(b) #5
# In[ ]:
#4 lists+funcs #####################################################
a = 1000 #1
d = [a,2] #2
def f(a,d): #3a
a = 2000 #3b
d[0] = a #3c
d = [] #3d
return d #3e
x = f(a,d) #4
# Extend(), append(), sort(), and sorted():
# In[28]:
#5 – lists operators and methods #####################################################
lst = [3,2,1]
id(lst)
lst
lst = lst+[0]
id(lst)
lst
lst.append(4)
id(lst)
lst
lst.insert(1,5)
id(lst)
lst
lst.extend([6,7])
id(lst)
lst
lst += [8]
id(lst)
lst
# In[29]:
lst
id(lst)
#sorted returns a sorted copy of the list, and does not change the original one
lst2 = sorted(lst)
id(lst)
lst
#list.sort() sorts in place, and does not return anything
lst.sort()
id(lst)
lst
# ## comparison between + and +=
# We use + or += operators in order to construct the same list.
#
# Using operator +: less efficient, since a new list is constructed every iteration
# the number of integers written to memory equals 1+2+ ... + n = (n+1)*n/2
# (= asumptotically speaking, grows quadratically with n)
#
# Using operator +=: more efficient, since the same list is extended again and again
# the number of integers written to memory equals n
# (= asumptotically speaking, grows linearly with n)
# ### memory and running times
# In[5]:
import time
# In[12]:
n= 20000
lst = []
t0 = time.perf_counter()
for i in range(n):
lst = lst + [i]
t1 = time.perf_counter()
print("Extending a list n=", n, "times, using the + operator took",t1-t0, "seconds")
lst = []
t0 = time.perf_counter()
for i in range(n):
lst += [i]
t1 = time.perf_counter()
print("Extending a list n=", n, "times, using the += operator (extend()) took",t1-t0, "seconds")
# We double the size of the input.
# In[13]:
n= 40000
lst = []
t0 = time.perf_counter()
for i in range(n):
lst = lst + [i]
t1 = time.perf_counter()
print("Extending a list n=", n, "times, using the + operator took",t1-t0, "seconds")
lst = []
t0 = time.perf_counter()
for i in range(n):
lst += [i]
t1 = time.perf_counter()
print("Extending a list n=", n, "times, using the += operator (extend()) took",t1-t0, "seconds")
# ______________________________________________________________
#
# In accordance with the theory, the running time of the inefficient code increases by approximately 2**2 = 4 as n increases by 2, while the running time of the efficient code increases by approximately 2.
# Apparently n is large enough for the constants not to play a serious role, so that the measurements agree with the asymptotic analysis.