#!/usr/bin/env python # coding: utf-8 # # Teichmueller harmonic map flow -- Lecture 2 # # > [Peter Topping](http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~maseq/), University of Warwick # # #### [Ascona Winter School 2016](http://www.math.uzh.ch/pde16/index-Ascona2016.html), [(alternate link)](http://www.monteverita.org/en/90/default.aspx?idEvent=295&archive=) # # [extended notes on the lectures](http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~maseq/ASCONA/) # 1. [Lecture 1](http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/colliand/ascona2016/blob/master/topping-lecture1.ipynb) # 2. [Lecture 2](http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/colliand/ascona2016/blob/master/topping-lecture2.ipynb) # 3. [Lecture 3](http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/colliand/ascona2016/blob/master/topping-lecture3.ipynb) # 4. [Lecture 4](http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/colliand/ascona2016/blob/master/topping-lecture4.ipynb) # # [source](https://github.com/colliand/ascona2016) # # # ## The Harmonic Map Flow # # [Eels-Sampson 1964](http://www.math.jhu.edu/~js/Math646/eells-sampson.pdf) # # $$u:(M,g) \longmapsto (N,G)$$ # # $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \tau (u) = "\Delta u"$$ # # $$ \implies \frac{dE}{dt} = - \int |\tau|^2$$. # # # ** Theorem (Eels-Sampson, Hartman):** If $(N,g)$ has nonpositive sectional curvature, then given $u:M \longmapsto N ~ \exists$ smooth flow $u$ with $u(0) = u_0$ and $u(t) \rightarrow u_\infty$ in $C^k$ as $ t \rightarrow \infty$ where $u_\infty$ is a harmonic map $M \longmapsto N$, momostopic to $u_0$. # # Hartman's contribution was to show that the convergence is uniform. Hartman also showed that the destination map is "essentially" unique. # Let's switch back to two dimensions but release the condition that the curvature is nonpositive. We can them embed $(N,G)$ isometrically into $\mathbb{R}^n$ using the [Nash Embedding Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_embedding_theorem). # # The simplest thing you might do is to calcluate the Laplacian and then project it into the direction of the tension field. Harmonic map flow: # $$ # \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = (\Delta u)^T. # $$ # # The reason for doing this embedding is that it allows us to beging talking about rough embeddings right away. The embedding allows us to discuss Sobolev regularity, for example. # # **Theorem (Struwe 85):** Given $ u \in W^{1,p}(M,N)$ there exists weak solution $u \in W^{1,2}_{loc} (M \times [0, \infty), N)$ which is smooth except at finitely many points $S_1 \subset M \times (0, \infty)$ such that # # 1. $u(0) = u_0$, # 2. $E(u(t)) \searrow$ in $t$ # 3. There exists a sequence of times $t_i \rightarrow \infty$ and a smooth harmonic map $u_\infty : M \rightarrow N$ such that $u(t_i) \rightharpoonup u_\infty$ in $W^{1,2} (M,N)$ and $u(t_i) \rightarrow u_\infty$ in $W^{2,2}_{loc} (M\backslash S_2, N)$ finite set. # We can't omit the $S_1, S_2$ singular sets. # # **Theorem (Eels-Wood):** There does not exist a harmonic map of degree 1 from $T^2 \longmapsto S^2$. # # Maps like this exist but they can not be deformed into harmonic maps. # At points in $S_1$ and $S_2$, we encounter the phenomena of **bubbling**. A quantum of energy would be flowing into a small region of space. There is only one strategy to try and understand what's going on in this scenario: rescale! # # **Theorem (Struwe):** Suppose $u$ as in preceding theorem. Then WLOG $\{ t_i \}$ also satisfies: # $\forall ~x_0 \in S_2$, when we pick local isothermal coordinates near $x_0$ there exists rescaling points $a_i \rightarrow 0 \subset ~\mathbb{R}^2$ and scales $\lambda_i \searrow 0$ and nonconstant harmonic map $\omega: S^2 \longmapsto (N,G)$ such that $u(a_i + \lambda_i y, t_i) \longmapsto \omega (y)$ in $W^{2,2}_{loc} (\mathbb{R}^2, N).$ # You can also perform this rescaled bubble analysis at finite time. # That's a way of extracting a bubble. The energy will be lost into the bubble. The next part of the story involves a conisderation of different rescaling centers and scales which may capture other mechanisms for the loss of energy. We know by the Eels-Wood result that we can't have $S_1$ and $S_2$ both be empty. Some examples by Cheng-Ding and others show that the various possible scenarios are actually realized. # **Consequence:** If there does not exist a bubble in $(N,g)$ then the flow is globally smooth and converges to $u_\infty$ uniformly. # # **Lemma:** There does not exist a non-constant harmonic map $S^2 \rightarrow (N,G)$ if $(N,G)$ has nonpositive curvature. # # Why? Suppose you do have such a map. Take your target and lift it to the universal cover. You can then lift the map so this gives a nonconstant harmonic map from $S^2$ into the universal cover of a nonpositively curved manifold. On such a manifold, the distnace from any point defines a convex function. You can compose the distance function with the harmonic map and then deduce, using the maximum principle, that the harmonic map must be constant. # **Theorem:** Suppose the closed target manifold satisfies $\Pi_2 (N) \neq \{0 \}$. Then $\forall ~G$ there exists a BMI (branched minimal immersion) with $S^2 \longmapsto (N, G)$. # # **Proof:** Take a nontrivial $u_0: S^2 \longmapsto N$. Flow using the harmonic map flow. Then, there is a dichotomy. Either $S_1 = \emptyset, ~S_2 = \emptyset$ and $u_\infty$ is that BMI, OR a bubble develops and $\omega$ is that BMI. # You can often find harmonic maps from $S^2$. What would you do if you want to build a high genus harmonic map? How can we find high genus branched minimal immersions? # # ## Finding higher genus BMIs # Now, we need to look for critical points of $E(u,g)$. # # * try gradient flow for $E(u,g)$. What does this mean? $L^2$-gradient flow? Move $u$ in the direction of the tension field and the $g$ should move in the direction of $\Re( \Phi(u,g) )$. There's maybe a theory here but it's tricky and hard to analyze. You could normalize by adding a negative Ricci term...seems bad. # * We proceed differerntly. Exploit the conformal invariance of the energy $E(u,g) = E(u, fg)$ with $f>0$. We can therefore choose a nice conformal representative of $g$. This allows us to restrict $g$ to metrics with constant curvature. We can even do a bit better than that...super important result # # **Lemma:** Any surface $(N,g)$ can be conformally deformed to a surface of constant Gauss curvature with value $+1, 0, -1$. $M=S^2$ corresponds to case +1. $M=\mathbb{T}^2$ corresponds to case 0. $genus(M) \geq 2 $ is in the case -1. # # **Proof of Lemma:** Run Ricci flow. $\frac{\partial g}{\partial t} = (k_0 - k) g$ where $k_0 = \{ +1, 0 , -a \}$. # # Idea of the Teichmller Harmonic map flow is to restrict $g$ to $\mathcal{M}_c$. The next task is to begin to understand this set of constant curvature metrics. # In[ ]: